Two-reviewer rule
Each submission is judged by at least two independent reviewers against a public rubric.
No attendance certificates. MetaX credentials are portfolio-based, peer-reviewed and publicly verifiable — a claim about your judgment under scrutiny, backed by evidence anyone can check.
A credential is only worth the scrutiny it survived. Ours publish the scrutiny.
Each rung raises the bar of evidence and the depth of review.
Every submission follows the same shape, so reviewers judge substance, not formatting.
Using AI is allowed and encouraged. Hiding it is not. Every submission declares where and how AI was used. Undisclosed AI use is grounds for revocation.
Each submission is judged by at least two independent reviewers against a public rubric.
Any decision can be appealed once to a third reviewer. The appeal outcome is logged.
Revocations and their reasons are published in an annual integrity report.
Every issued credential has a public verification record. Paste an ID to confirm the holder, the rung, the date, and the reviewers.